-->

Parricide



ELEMENTS:
1. That a person is killed;
2. That the deceased is killed by the accused;
3. That the deceased is the
   a. father, mother, or
   b. child, whether legitimate or illegitimate, or
   c. legitimate other ascendant or other descendant, or
   d. legitimate spouse of the accused.

The relationship of the offender with the victim is the essential element of parricide.

Parents and children are not included in the term “ascendants” or “descendants”.

The other ascendant or descendant must be legitimate. On the other hand, the father,
mother or child may be legitimate or illegitimate.

The child should not be less than 3 days old. Otherwise, the offense is infanticide.

Relationship must be alleged and proved.

A stranger who cooperates in committing parricide is liable for murder or homicide.

Even if the offender did not know that the person he had killed is his son, he is still
liable for parricide because the law does not require knowledge of the relationship.

Essential element: relationship of offender with the victim; except for spouses, only relatives by blood and in direct line (adopted are not included)

Supreme Court ruled that Muslim husbands with several wives can be convicted of parricide only in case the first wife is killed.

Relationship must be alleged. If not, relationship would only be considered
as aggravating circumstance.

Cases of parricide when the penalty shall not be reclusion perpetua to death:
1. parricide through negligence (Art.365)
2. parricide by mistake (Art. 49)
3. parricide under exceptional circumstances (Art. 247)


People vs. Dalag
A stranger who cooperates and takes part in the commission of the crime
of parricide, is not guilty of parricide but only homicide or murder, as the case may
be. The key element in parricide is the relationship of the offender with the victim.



Serious Physical Injuries



HOW COMMITTED:
1. Wounding;
2. Beating;
3. Assaulting; or
4. Administering injurious substances.

SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURIES:
1. When the injured person becomes insane,imbecile, impotent or blind in consequence
   of the physical injuries inflicted.

2. When the injured person –
   a. loses the use of speech or the power to hear or to smell, loses an eye, a hand,
      foot, arm or leg,
   b. loses the use of any such member, or
   c. becomes incapacitated for the work in which he had been habitually engaged

3. When the injured person –
   a. becomes deformed,
   b. loses any other member of his body,
   c. loses the use thereof, or
   d. becomes ill or incapacitated for the performance of the work in which he
      had been habitually engaged in for more than 90 days.

4. When the injured person becomes ill or incapacitated for labor for more than 30
   days (but not more than 90 days).


Serious physical injuries may be committed through reckless imprudence or simple
imprudence.

There must be no intent to kill.

Impotence includes inability to copulate and sterility.

Blindness requires lost of vision in both eyes. Mere weakness in vision is not
contemplated.

Loss of power to hear must involve both ears. Otherwise, it will be considered as
serious physical injuries under par 3.

Loss of the power to hear in the right ear is considered as merely loss of use of some
other part of the body.

Loss of use of hand or incapacity of usual work in paragraph 2 must be permanent.

Paragraph 2 refers to principal members of the body. Paragraph 3, on the other hand,
covers any other member that is not a principal part of the body. In this respect, a
front tooth is considered as a member of the body and not a principal member.

Deformity means physical ugliness, permanent and definite abnormality that is
not curable by natural means or by nature. It must be conspicuous and visible. Thus, if
the scar is usually covered by a dress, it would not be conspicuous and visible. Loss
of teeth as deformity will not apply to child or
old man.

Indirect Bribery

Indirect Bribery
Indirect Bribey
Indirect Bribery


1. Offender is a public officer;
2. He accepts gifts; and
3. Gifts are offered to him by reason of his office.

NOTES:

The gift is given in anticipation of future favor from the public officer.

There must be a clear intention on the part of the public officer to take the gift offered and consider the property as his own for that moment. Mere physical receipt unaccompanied by any other sign, circumstance, or act to show such acceptance is not sufficient to convict the officer.

There is no attempted or frustrated indirect bribery.

Public officers receiving gifts and private persons giving gifts on any occasion, including Christmas, are liable under PD 46.

The criminal penalty or imprisonment is distinct from the administrative penalty of suspension from the service.


The principal distinction between direct and indirect bribery is that in the former, the officer agrees to perform or refrain from doing an act in consideration of the gift or promise. In the latter case, it is not necessary that the officer do any act. It is sufficient that he accepts the gift offered by reason of his office.

If after receiving the gift, the officer does any act in favor of the giver which is unfair to the others, it ceases to be indirect but becomes direct bribery.

This is always in the consummated stage. There is no attempted much less frustrated stage in indirect bribery.

There must be clear intention on the part of the public officer
a.to take the gift offered and
b.consider the property as his own for that moment.

Mere physical receipt unaccompanied by any other sign, circumstance, or act to show such acceptance is not sufficient to convict the officer.

Public officers receiving gifts and private persons giving gifts on any occasion, including Christmas are liable under PD 46.

Bar EXam Question (2006)

PD 46 & RA 6713 & Indirect Bribery (2006)

Commissioner Marian Torres of the Bureau of internal Revenue (BIR) wrote solicitation letters addressed to the Filipino-Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry and to certain CEOs of various multinational corporations requesting donations of gifts for her office Christmas party. She used the Bureau's official stationery. The response was prompt and overwhelming so much so that Commissioner Torres' office was overcrowded with rice cookers, radio sets, freezers, electric stoves and toasters. Her staff also received several envelopes containing cash money for the employees' Christmas luncheon. Has Commissioner Torres committed any impropriety or irregularity? What laws or decrees did she violate?

Suggested Answer:

Yes, Commissioner Torres violated the following:

1. RA. 6713 — Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees when he solicited and accept gifts
(Sec.7[d]). 
2. P.D. 46 — Making it punishable for public officials and employees to receive, and for private persons to give, gifts on any occasion, including Christmas.
3. Indirect Bribery (Art. 211, Revised Penal Code) for receiving gifts offered by reason of office.






Criminology Schools With 0% Passing Percentage - April 2014 Exam

Criminology Schools With Zero Percent Passing Percentage in the April 2014 Exam

39 Criminology Schools in the Philippines failed to produce a single Criminologist in this year's Criminology Board Examination, April 2014. The Board Exam Result showed that the following
schools have a 0% passing percentage.

1.  Agoncillo College Inc

2.  AMA Computer College - Tuguegarao City

3.  Assumption College of Davao

4.  Calabanga Polytechnic College

5.  Camarines Sur State Agricultural College

6.  Capiz State University - main campus

7.  Central Bicol State University of Agriculture - Pili

8.  Colegio de Sta. Catalina de Alejandria

9.  College of Maasin

10. Cotabato City State Polytechnic College

11. Dansalan Polytechnic College

12. Dipolog City Institute of Technology

13. Divine Word University - Tacloban

14. Eastern Visayas State University - Tacloban

15. Iloilo Doctors College of Medicine

16. Isabela School of Arts and Trade

17. Leyte State College

18. Manto Memorial Foundation College

19. Northern College Foundation Inc - Dagupan City

20. Northern Cotabato Colleges Foundation Inc

21. Northern Samar Academy

22. Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila

23. Pangasinan State University - Binmaley

24. Pangasinan State university - Urdaneta

25. Partido State University

26. Pedro T Mendiola Sr. Memorial Technical and Polytechnic College

27. Saint John General Hospital College - Buug

28. Saint Paul College Foundation Inc

29. San Nicolas College

30. Sta Catalina College

31. Santiago Colleges

32. Shariff Kabunsuan College

33. Southern Philippine Academy

34. Southern Philippine Academy College Inc

35. Southern Philippines Agricultural, Marine and Aquatic School of Technology

36. St. Joseph College - Cavite City

37. Subic Bay College Inc

38. Tangub City Colleges

39. University of Perpetual Help - Laguna


The above article was based on the report released by the Professional Regulation Commission, Any discrepancy of this article with the original report is solely my fault and kindly post a message below or in my contact information so that the errors can be immediately corrected.

Most of the schools mentioned above have only one to six examinees, so it is fair to say that the above data is not the only measure to judge the quality of instruction of the school.

Article 233. Refusal Of Assistance

Refusal of Assistance
Refusal Of Assistance

Article 233. Refusal of assistance.
- The penalties of arresto mayor in its medium period to prision correccional in its minimum period, perpetual special disqualification and a fine not exceeding Two hundred thousand pesos (P200,000), shall be imposed upon a public officer who. upon demand from competent authority, shall fail to lend his cooperation towards the administration of justice or other public service, if such failure shall result in serious damage to the public interest, or to a third party: otherwise, arresto mayor in its medium and maximum periods and a fine not exceeding One hundred thousand pesos (P 100,000) shall be imposed.


This is a felony punishable under the Revised Penal Code.

To become liable, the following element must be present:

1. The offender is a public officer

2. A competent authority demands from the offender that he lend his  cooperation 
     towards  the administration of justice or other public service

3. The offender fails to do so maliciously
  • The request must come from one public officer to another.
  • Damage to the public interest or third party is essential.
  • Demand is necessary.
  • The demand must be from a competent authority.
  • If he receives consideration, therefore, bribery is committed.
  • But mere demand will fall under the prohibition under the provision of Republic Act No. 3019 (Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act).

Usurpation of Executive Functions

philippine judge
A Judge symbol in the court room.


This is a felony punishable under the revised penal code.

To be liable under this law. The following element must be present:
1. The offender is a judge; and
2. He (a) assumes a power pertaining to the executive authorities, or
      (b) obstructs executive authorities in the lawful exercise of
          their powers.

*Legislative officers are not liable for usurpation of executive functions.

Most Popular Criminology Review Center in the Philippines


criminology review center
Criminology Review Center

Popular Criminology Review Center in the Philippines

1. CMT Target Training and Seminars
     a. Location - Cebu City
     b. Exact Address - 2nd floor, Melgo building,
                                    Sanciangko street,
                                    Pahina Central.
     c. Contact Number - (032) 575-0400
     d. Web Presence - facebook.com/pages
         /CMT-Target-Criminology

2. Caritas Christi Criminology Review Center
     a. Location - Surigao City
     b. Exact Address - 3rd Floor, Laurente Bldg., Rizal street
     c. Contact Number - 09285070311
     d. Web Presence - facebook.com/caritas-christi-criminology

3. Delta Review Center
     a. Location - Puerto Princesa City
     b. Exact Address - Pajara, Sta. Monica
     c. Contact Number - 09175532211
     d. Web Presence - www.DeltaReviewCenter.com

4. St. Louis Review Center
     a. Location - Baguio City
     b. Exact Address - Suite 301, Layman Ogilby Centrum, 358 Magsaysay avenue.
     c. Contact Number - (074) 4458085
     d. Web Presence - www.slreviewcenter.com

5. Dynamic Edge Learning Solutions
     a. Location - Cebu City
     b. Exact Address - 3rd Floor, Coast Pacific Downtown Center, Sanciangko Street
     c. Contact Number - (032) 3820554
     d. Web Presence - facebook.com/pages/Dynamic-Edge-Learning-Solution

6. R.A Gapuz Review Center
     a. Location - Quezon City
     b. Exact Address - 3rd Floor, North Link Building, SM North Edsa
     c. Contact Number - (02) 7365164
     d. Web Presence - www.ragapuzreview.com

7. Rank One Review and Training Center
     a. Location - Manila
     b. Exact Address - 1139 Adelina Street, Corner Espana Place Building,  Sampalok
     c. Contact Number - (02) 7361732
     d. Web Presence - www.rankone1.com

8. Polaris Review Center
     a. Location - Palawan
     b. Exact Address - 35 Fernandez Street, Perto Princesa City
     C. Contact Number - (48) 4346824
     d. Web Presence - www.polarisreviewcenter.com

9. N.G. Review Center
     a. Location - Iloilo City
     b. Exact Address - 23 A&N Building, San Jose Street, Jaro
     c. Contact Number - (033) 3202053
     d. Web Presence - www.ngreviewcenter.com

10.Quest Review Center
     a. Location - Manila
     b. Exact Address - 1550 Espana Boulevard,Corner Lacson Avenue, Sampalok
     c. Contact Number - 09098733892
     d. Web Presence - www.facebook.com/QuestReviewCenter

Listed here under are some of the top review center for criminology,  schools that operate its own Review Center.



While these are the most popular criminology review center I found on the net, It does not necessarily mean that they are the top criminology review center in terms of examinees passing percentage.

In the December 2018 Criminology Licensure Examination, these are the top performing schools
which you may consider when shopping for a review center.
1. Tarlac State University
2. King's College of the Philippines
3. Cavite State University
4.Univesity of the Cordilleras
5.Laguna State Polytechnic University
6. Data Center College of the Philippines